Board Meeting
June 22, 2026
Transcript
Describer:
Regular Board Meeting- June 22, 2026
I. Call meeting to order
A. Roll call & disclosure of potential conflicts
II. Public comment period (three minute maximum per person)
Public comment is designed to share your thoughts and concerns with the district, but it is not an interactive discussion.
III. Consent Agenda
This is a group of items to be acted on with a single motion, second and vote by the Board to expedite the handling of limited routine matters. The Board has previously received information on these matters and/or discussed them at a prior study session. Any board member may move an item from the consent agenda to the meeting agenda at this time.
Proposed Motion: I move to approve the items as presented in the consent agenda.
A. Approve May 26, 2026 Regular Board Meeting Minutes
CPNMD Board Meeting Minutes 5.26.26 4937-9240-7477 v.1 (1) (PDF, opens in new tab)
B. Approve May 18, 2026 Work Session Minutes
5.18.26 Draft Work Session Minutes 4925-6537-6949 v.1 (1) (PDF, opens in new tab)
C. Ratify claims for payment including check numbers 29692 – 29729 and electronic payments issued from May 13, 2026 to June 10, 2026 totaling $1,600,653.59
D. Rules and Regulations Update re Enforcement
CPNMD Article 16 Redline (Clean) (1) (PDF, opens in new tab)
E. Waterline Easement Agreement - Foundry Church
CPNMD-Foundry Water Easement Agreement (Draft) (PDF, opens in new tab)
F. Main Extension Agreement - Foundry Church
CPNMD-Foundry Main Extension Agreement 4932-9100-5102 v.5 (PDF, opens in new tab)
G. The Ridge at Castle Pines North - Water Service Agreement
Ridge Water Service Agreement (Ridge Signed) 4910-3542-0596 v.1 (1) (PDF, opens in new tab)
IV. Public Hearing - Consideration and Approval of Resolution Approving Inclusion of Real Property within Hidden Pointe Metropolitan District Public Hearing — Inclusion of the Hidden Pointe Metropolitan District (Green Valley Subdivision) into the District Pursuant to § 32-1-401(2), C.R.S.
Motion to open the public hearing
Proposed Motion: I move to open the public hearing on the proposed inclusion of the territory of the Hidden Pointe Metropolitan District into the Castle Pines North Metropolitan District.
Paul: Confirmation of proof of publication and mailed owner notice
Paul: Presentation by legal counsel
Public comment and receipt of any written objections
Motion to close the public hearing.
Consideration of Resolution No. 2026-6-2 approving the inclusion
CPNMD Resolution Hidden Pointe Inclusion 4924-5594-8214 v.1 (PDF, opens in new tab) Statement of support from Doug Polzin, President- Hidden Pointe HOA (PDF, opens in new tab)
V. Leak Adjustment Request: Brambleridge HOA
Proposed Motion: I move to (approve/deny) the Brambleridge HOA request for a leak adjustment.
Customer States their system was inadvertently activated during the month of April, with limited watering budget.
HOA was previously granted an adjustment in November of 2025. District rules and regulations restrict leak adjustments to one adjustment every two years.
When adjusting for leaks, CPNMD still bills for the water used, all use is billed at the "tier one" rate.
VI. Presentation and Consideration of South Tanks Rehab CMGC Award
Proposed Motion: I move to approve the CMGC Agreement with Myers & Sons for the South Tank Rehabilitation Project and to delegate authority to the District Manager to finalize the agreement, negotiate any non-material contract modifications, and execute the agreement, subject to review and approval by legal counsel.
CPN_South_Tanks_CMGC_Recommendation_Letter (PDF, opens in new tab)
CMGC Award Presentation Package (PDF, opens in new tab)
VII. Finance Report
The Finance Director will present an overview of the District’s financial condition, including budget performance, revenue and expenditure activity, cash balances, and other financial matters for the Board’s review.
CPNMD 06.22.2026 Finance Board Packet (PDF, opens in new tab)
VIII. Legal Counsel Status Report
Legal Counsel will provide an update on legal matters affecting the District, including but not limited to: contracts, compliance issues, ongoing or potential litigation, and other legal considerations for the Board’s information and guidance.
6.22.2026 Legal Status Report- CPNMD 4907-3757-4071 v.1 (PDF, opens in new tab)
IX. District Manager Report
The District Manager will present a report to the Board regarding district operations, project status, administrative activities, and other matters pertinent to the District
District Manager Board Report 6_22_26 (PDF, opens in new tab)
A. Update: Stantec Regional Water Supply Study
B. Update: Interconnect Pump Station Surge Modification Project
C. Update: Water Treatment Plant Filter Upgrade Project
D. Update: Well Status
X. Operations & Engineering Report
These reports are included in the monthly Board Packet, this agenda item serves as an opportunity for the board to ask any questions they have regarding the reports.
May 2026 Operations Report (PDF, opens in new tab)
Engineering Report June 2026 (PDF, opens in new tab)
XI. Director's Matters
Board members may raise and discuss items of interest, concerns, or announcements that are not otherwise included on the agenda.
XII. Adjourn
Board President Jason Blankaert:
We'll get started now, if everybody's ready. Okay. Well, good evening, and welcome to the Castle Pines North Metropolitan District regular board meeting for Monday, June 22nd, 2026 is approximately 6 p.m..
We'll call the meeting to order and we'll start with a roll call. Let's see.
Board Member Director Tera Radloff:
Tera. Present. No conflicts.
Board Member Director Leah Enquist:
Leah. Excuse me. Present. No conflicts.
Board Member Director Jana Krell:
Jana. No conflicts.
Jason:
And I am Jason Blankaert present with no conflicts. Having that, then we will open up. We'll close item one and open up item two. The public comment period. Do we have anybody wishing to give a public comment this evening?
Okay. Hearing none, we'll go ahead and close out the public comment period and we will remove and we'll move on to item number three, the consent agenda. This is a group of items to be acted on with the single motion second, and a vote by the board to expedite the handling of limited routine matters. The board has previously received information on these matters and or discussed them at a prior study session.
Any board member may move an item from the consent agenda to the meeting agenda. At this time. I'll go ahead and make a motion. I move to approve these items as presented. The consent in the consent agenda. Second. Having second, we'll move to vote.
Board Voting All Speak:
Tera. I. Jana. I. Leah. I approve. And I approve as well. The motion passes and we have approved the consent agenda for this evening.
Jason:
Having proceeded with all that, we will move on to item number four, the public hearing, consideration and approval of a resolution approving inclusion of the real property within Hidden Point Metropolitan District.
Describer:
On screen.
CASTLE PINES NORTH METROPOLITAN DISTRICT DOUGLAS COUNTY, COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-6-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CASTLE PINES NORTH METROPOLITAN DISTRICT APPROVING THE INCLUSION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTO THE DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 32-1-401(2), C.R.S.
Legal Counsel Paul Polito, Esq.:
Thank you. Jason, I'm happy to, open this up a bit. On page 48 of the packet is the resolution. And regarding the inclusion of the real property, comprising Hidden Point into the district, We now have reached the public hearing on the proposed inclusion of territory within the Hidden Plain Metropolitan District into the Castle Pines North Metropolitan District.
And at this point, the board can entertain a motion to, open the public hearing.
Jason:
I move that we open the public hearing on the proposed inclusion of the territory of the Hidden Point Metropolitan District into the Castle Pines North Metropolitan district. Second.
Board Voting All Speak:
Having a second we’ll go to vote. Leah. I approve. Jana. Approve. Tera. I.
And I approve as well.
Board Member Director James Mulvey:
Jason, I was able to join. Took me a minute though.
Jason:
Good evening Jim.
James:
Hey. Approve.
Jason:
Thank you. Jim. All right.
Paul:
Great. This public hearing is being held pursuant to section 32-1-401, subsection two, Colorado Revised Statutes. And this is to consider the inclusion into the district a real property comprising the Hidden Point Metropolitan District and generally known as Green Valley Subdivision, located in Douglas County.
T he proposed inclusion authorizes the board to include additional territory by resolution. The area proposed is again the territory of Hidden Point filings number one A and one B of the Green Valley subdivision plot. And related re-plot as well. The notice of this hearing is published in the Douglas County News-Press and in accordance with section 32-1-401(2) B and 32-1-103(15). Letter notification of this hearing was also mailed to the property owners within the area to be included, within the required 20 to 30 day window before this meeting, in accordance with section 32-1-401(3).
So the statute provides that any interested person, in any municipality or county that may be able to provide service to the property may appear and show cause in writing why the inclusion should not be approved. So any objections.
Would need to be submitted in writing so it can be entered into the record. As of the statutory deadline ten days before this meeting. No petition objecting to the inclusion under 32-1-401(2)G has been filed with the board, and the hearing is now open for comment. Any interested person or any municipality or county able to provide service to the property, may now appear and state
Any objections? If you do so, I do ask that you please state your name and address for the record before speaking and if you wish to object, please also provide your objection in writing at some point today.
Jason:
All right. Do we hear anybody who has any objections to this?
Hearing none. Paul, I think we should move on.
Paul:
Very good. Okay. And, Nathan, just to check, have any written objections or any objection petition been received in connection with the proposed inclusion?
District Manager Nathan Travis:
No, I do, Doug, on the opposite. I do have a letter of support. That's in the board backing, but no objection.
Paul:
Right. And so I think this would be an appropriate time to read that into the record.
This is at the request of, Doug Polzin, president of Hidden Point HOA. And he did request that we read this into the record for today. Since he was unable to attend today.
Describer:
On screen.
Dear CPNMD Board Members,
I am writing as President of the Hidden Pointe Homeowners Association. Unfortunately, I will be out of town and unable to attend the June 22 board meeting in person. I respectfully ask that this letter be read into the record.
Paul reads the rest.
Respectfully submitted,
Doug Polzin President, Hidden Pointe HOA cc: Hidden Pointe Metropolitan District Board
Paul:
So he's writing as president of a hidden plain homeowners association. And he states, starting in the second paragraph, we understand and appreciate the collaborative work that has taken place between the Castle Pines North Metropolitan District and the Hidden Point Metropolitan District meetings held in March and April.
Advancing an inclusion agreement that, if approved by the voters in November, will bring Hidden Point fully inside CPNMD boundaries. This will eliminate our current Non-district status and allow us to receive the same in district water and wastewater rates as the rest of the community. The 2023 Parks Mill levy increase brought Hidden Point properties up to the same overall mill level as other other HOAs in Castle Pines, so we were already aligned on the property tax side.
The inclusion process now gives us the opportunity to achieve full equality on utility rates side as well. Hidden Point HOA fully supports the efforts of both the CPNMD and HPMD boards to move this inclusion forward to the November 2026 ballot. We believe this is in the best interest of our residents and the broader Castle Pines community. From the HOA side, we are committed to communicating clearly with our homeowners and helping educate the community about the ballot measure so voters can make an informed decision.
Please know that we stand ready to assist in any way would be helpful, whether through neighborhood meetings, newsletter articles or other outreach. Thank you for the work both boards have put into this process and for your continued service to our community. We look forward to Hidden Point becoming fully integrated as part of Castle Pines Law. Okay, and unless there are any, further comments, the board can entertain a motion to close the public hearing.
At this point.
Nathan:
Yeah, we we do have one request to also speak. Jeffrey Huff with Hidden Point metro district board.
Paul:
Absolutely. Please go ahead.
Jeffrey Huff, HPMD board member:
Thank you. Nathan. Nathan said my name is Jeffrey Huff. I'm the president of the board of directors of the Hidden Point Metropolitan District. And I've been a homeowner here in Hidden Point for the past 26 years.
I'd like to thank the staff and the legal counsel, the Castle Pines North Metro district, for the many hours of work and effort that brought us to this meeting this evening. Nearly two years ago, we had a series of discussions that lead to Foundation for the Inclusion Agreement and the resolution you are considering tonight. This includes a window on the current non district status and allow Hidden Point residents to receive the same in district water and wastewater rates as the rest of Castle Pines North.
This will also reduce the costs of water and wastewater services to water residents by 25%. Furthermore, the agreement achieves those savings without any increase in property taxes and Hidden Point will continue to have the same property tax rate as other residents in the its North Metro District Service Area. If we are successful in getting voter approval of the inclusion agreement, this November is the intention of the Hidden Point Board to promptly initiate a full dissolution of the Hidden Point Metro District, eliminating a layer of government, and eliminate the associated administrative, accounting and legal expenses of the district.
Describer:
Jeffrey experienced audio difficulties during his presentation.
Jeffrey:
It's important metro district work and individually supports an agreement.
....... Thank you again for the time and effort you’ve invested over the past several months, and we look forward to the inclusion of Hidden Point .... and .... this process.
Jason:
Thank you very much, Jeffrey. Paul what is our next?
Paul:
And so with that. The board can entertain a motion to close the public hearing. Afterwards, you would, vote on the resolution?
Paul:
Well, I'd move to close the public hearing second.
Board Voting All Speak:
Great. Having a second. We'll move to vote. Jana, I. Leah. Approve. Jim. Approve. Tera. I. And I approve as well as the motion to close the open meeting has been approved.
Paul:
Okay. And then the resolution that is presented for your approval again starts on, page 48. It include eludes a bit of history to guide the reader, as to the steps the district has taken to fulfill statutory requirements as far as notice, and to give a little bit of context into the background, on page 49, you'll see the actual directives,
Incorporating the findings in paragraph one, approving the inclusion in paragraph two, approving the filing of an order of inclusion with the court in three, submission to the electors in 4 and the election being, occurring in November 3rd, 2026 in paragraph four, as well as including conditions that were originally included within the inclusion agreement that this board, previously adopted a few months ago.
With Hidden Point. Those terms are incorporated herein by reference as well. Six officers, legal counsel agents are directed and authorized to take any further actions that may have necessarily not been captured, within this resolution. So whatever, administrative functions we may have to do this, authorizes that, and it's effective immediately. So with that, the board, could discuss the resolution or move to a vote on it.
Jason:
Anybody have anything they'd like to discuss? I know we've been talking about this for a few months.
Tera:
I'd like to make a motion. I move to approve a resolution of the board of directors of the Castle Pines North Metropolitan District, approving the inclusion of certain real property into the district pursuant to section 32-1-401(2).
CRS.
Jason:
Thank you. Tera. Having a motion. Do I hear a second?
James:
I'll second the motion.
Board Voting All Speak:
Very well Jim Second. So we'll move to a vote. Jim. Approve. Tera. I. Leah. Approve. Jana. I. And I approve as well. The motion passes.
Paul:
Thank you, everybody. Thank you.
Jason:
All right. Very well. We will move. We will close item number four and move on to item number five, which is the Leak Adjustment Request. Presenters Eric and John.
John Berenger, Castle Pines Resident:
Hey, are you ready?
Jason:
Good evening. Yes, please.
John:
I'm John Berenger and I live at 8511 Bramble Ridge Drive in Bramble Ridge Village, Patio Homes. I'm the treasure of the board.
For the past two years and a little bit of background, if you're not familiar with Bramble Ridge, we're at the intersection or just southeast of the intersection of, Buffalo Trail and Monarch, where the new, roundabout is. We're built by village homes back in the early 2000s. And one of the features in the neighborhood is a, integrated irrigation system that covers all 79, home sites and then some open space.
Two boards ago, about four years ago, a system called weather track was installed, fairly fancy system. Last year, when the current board, which I'm a member of, took over, we decided to contract with the, the installer of the system, door property services and, have him tie-in with our land and landscaper, lawn care services out of, Highlands Ranch.
Nathan has quite a bit of background on this because we've talked to him about several issues, but we're talking about this one particular issue a couple of weeks ago, and he recommended that we come before the board to ask for a little bit of relief, if you can possibly see your way clear to do that. What happened this year.
Recommendation from our landscaper. We turned the system on early in April, and the objective there was to check for leaks. The system's 26 years old, so we've had a real problem with leaks. It is basically, a money pit as far as I'm concerned. But turn it on a little bit early to get the wet testing done to, do any repairs that were required.
And the two contractors were working in concert with each other. So, Eric, the guru on the system weather track system was coming in and looking for problem areas and starting the wet test, process, early in April, the intent was not to turn it on to actually start irrigating that and normally don't do that until May.
And we try to delay that as much as we can. And then a repair guy from Lawn Care Services was following up with Eric to come in and make necessary repairs, and so we'd be ready to go when it was time to actually turn the system on. Steve ... and I, he's the vice president of the board, sort of oversee the system.
OPS job during the summer time is to monitor the system. Look for leaks, adjusted system mixer, weather track's doing its job. Okay. He normally doesn't come on board until May, but since we turn the system a little bit early, he was out here working on it. A little bit of misunderstanding between the two contractors.
Every time OPS came out to do some troubleshooting and system testing, they found the system turned on. When they were done, they turned it off. Every time LCS came out to do repair work, obviously they had to turn the system on. In several cases, the system was not turned off. First thing, the first indication we got, I got, was when I got a preliminary bill from the metro district, our budget, we have four clocks for controllers.
The April budget for each one was 80,000 gallons. That should have been perfectly sufficient to cover all the wet testing and repair work before we turn the system up in May. To which time it goes about 279, 280,000 gallons per controller. What happened was the system between the two contractors not actually talking to each other like they should.
And a little bit of misunderstanding. We, basically had a July water bill in April, so the average per clock was about 180,000 gallons times four. So we ended up in tier four on all four controllers. What we're asking is that a little bit of consideration. We fix this problem okay. It's not going to happen again, hopefully. But, ask for your consideration and, and possibly give us a little relief on the tier.
Yeah, I'm sure you're perfectly aware what happens when you go from tier two to 3 to 4 as far as cost per thousand gallons? So basically I said dollar wise and also usage wise, because of this misunderstanding between the two contractors who again, we ended up with a June or July water bill. So with that, if you have any questions, please ask.
Jason:
Thank you. John. Nathan, could you expand a little bit more on this? Yeah. So, like adjustments for things like this or something that we do fairly routinely, the way that that works and our rules and regulations, there's a few metrics that typically have to be met. We still recover our cost for recouping the water. So everything still gets billed out.
It would be billed out at a tier one rate. So it's just taking that penalty or that tier structure away from it. Our the only reason that I asked, John to bring this to the board of directors is that our rules of rules and regulations, prohibits more than one, adjustment every two years. Generally speaking, I feel like that's in place to just encourage people to maintain their systems, try and stay on top of everything.
In this particular case, Bramble Ridge, John mentioned I've had a couple of meetings with them or several meetings with them over the past few years. They really have been doing a very like, good foot forward effort to, to, consciously use their water. They've taken advantage of our rebate programs. They've been started installed smart controllers, especially as an HOA that, you know, I'd say, you know, four years looking backward, four years and beyond, with kind of historically a problem child.
There was a lot of, a lot of leaks, a lot of, maintenance issues just weren't there. But they really have been putting their best foot forward the past few years or so. from a from a staff perspective, I think that a, an adjustment is, could be warranted and justified. It's just outside of the rules and regulations.
So it requires board action to do so.
Jason:
Very good.
Jana:
One adjustments, sorry Jason, but an adjustment. And then maybe just restate it. What are we saying and the adjustments is?
Nathan:
The adjustment would be billing all of their usage for April at the tier one rate. I don't have the exact figure for.
Jana:
Pro rate at tier one okay.
No further questions for me. I don't I don't have a problem with it, just from the reasons that Nathan said is that it seems like they're trying to be water wise. I, I don't think they expected, you know, this at all. And it sounds like an error contractors, you know, created for them, so no issues from me.
Jason:
Thanks, Jana.
Tera:
I agree with Jana.
Jason:
Thanks, Tera. Anybody else?
I don't have any problem with, the tier one recommendation. Nathan. Do we need a proposal?
Nathan:
Yeah. So there is a proposed motion in the package. Is to approve or deny the Bramble Ridge HOA request.
Jason:
I'll go ahead and propose it. I move to approve the CMG. The agreement with Myers. Oh, sorry wrong one. Thank you. I, move to approve the Bramble Bridge HOA request for leak adjustment.
Jana:
I'll second.
Board Voting All Speak:
Having a second. We'll go to vote. Jim. Approve. Jana. I. Leah. Approve. Sorry. Tera. Approve. I approve too. I got some kind of allergy things going on there. Okay. Having, five votes, we approve the motion.
John:
And I’d like to extend my appreciation to the entire board. Thank you very much. It really helps our budget out.
Jason:
Thanks, John.
Tera:
Thank you for all of your efforts to be conscious about your water use.
John:
Well, we're trying we're trying that, like I said, the system, I've never seen anything like this, you know, in my life. I've been around for a while, and, in retrospect, village probably didn't do the neighborhood any any favors when they built the system.
And we're we're trying to cope with it and get it up to get it up to speed and use our waters wisely as we can. We keep running into brick walls like this. Hopefully this won't happen again.
Tera:
Keep up the good work.
John:
Thank you.
Jason:
Yes. Thank you. And we'll go ahead and close out item number 4 or 5.
John:
And thanks, Nathan.
Jason:
Thanks. And we'll move on to item number six. The presentation and consideration of Tanks Rehab CMGC Award.
Describer:
On screen. Slide Deck from Kennedy Jenks
Castle Pines North Metro District – South Tanks Rehabilitation Project CMGC Presented by: Nathan Travis
An overhead view from about 200 feet with the golf course at the top of the picture above the tennis courts, and below the tennis courts a parking lot. On the left and right side of the parking lot are where the two tanks are planned and illustrated. One next to the parking lot on the left and one behind what looks like a club house for the tennis courts on the right.
Nathan:
Alright so Adam Mark has with Kennedy Jenks is, online and available if we have any additional questions. He was also kind enough to put this presentation together for us that I am going to be running through.
So we really just wanted to walk through the process, that we've gone through to get to this point with the South tank, rehabilitation project. This is to rehabilitate the two existing tanks. And we are looking at doing the same type of, construction contract, that we did with the filter renovation project or that we're doing with the filter renovation project.
Describer:
On screen. Slide Deck from Kennedy Jenks
Agenda
Topics
1. Project Overview
2. Scope of Work
3. Selection Process
4. Questions
5. Proposed Motion
Project Overview
• KJ assessed tanks in 2024
- Documented conditions and recommendations in 2025 TM
• CMGC RFP issued in April 2026
• Current Schedule
- Tank #1: drain October 2026, construct January 2027
- Tank #2: drain October 2027, construct January 2028
Pictures of the current state of the tanks.
Nathan:
So brief project overview. We assessed both of these tanks in 2024, documented those recommendations, documented those recommendations in 2025, and then issued an RFP for this contract in April of this year. More than likely with the even with the proposed schedules, this is going to take place over two separate winter months. That's, largely driven due to the location right next to the golf course.
We want to make sure that we're being good neighbors and partners to them. And just making sure that we're not interrupting their business. So these do need to be conducted over the winter. So that would start this year, in October of 2026. Draining tank one. That'll be getting, getting quantities, doing like further inspections, finalizing design.
And then moving forward toward construction in January of 2027 and then repeating that process again with tank to the following year, 2027 and the 2028.
Describer:
On screen. Slide Deck from Kennedy Jenks
Project Overview
Tank #1
• Interior tank concrete repairs.
• Valve, overflow, and ladder replacement.
• Upgrade entrance hatch.
• Vent upgrades per CDPHE.
• Install redundant low water alarm.
Valve Vault
• Demolish and replace existing manhole.
• Improve safety and access.
• Replace old valves and piping.
• Cap and abandon 8” pipe to unknown location in distribution system.
Tank #2
• Interior tank concrete repairs.
• Overflow and ladder replacement.
• Upgrade to solar power to reduce reliance on Country Club power system.
• Vent upgrades per CDPHE.
• Install redundant low water alarm.
Nathan:
So fairly similar. Tank one is a little bit different in that it does include this valve vault, but we're really just looking at some, interior tank repairs, upgrading hatches. Both tanks need, tank ventilation to be upgraded to meet current CDPHE regulations and then also doing some redundant alarm work while we're in there. With tank one, there is also an existing valve vault that is in really, really rough condition.
So that vault needs to be replaced. We need to improve access and safety. There's some old valves and some piping down there that need to be fully removed. There's also a line. We believe there's a line that is, runs through an old interconnect with Castle Pines Metro district. That line, according to all of our drawings, is an eight inch.
It runs somewhere between 2 and 3 miles. And it's also unveiled. So in theory, if there's ever a break on that line, if it is configured, the way that we think it would be would require us to basically drain the tank through the break before we be able to stop and do any kind of repair. So we want to make sure that we kind of get rid of that vulnerability.
Tank two is a newer tank. It was built, you know, more than 20 years after, I guess around 20 years after the first time the tank one was built. It is in much better condition. But we'll be looking at, kind of the same approach with that one. A lot of the same conditions, just to a lesser extent.
Describer:
On screen. Slide Deck from Kennedy Jenks
Scope of CMGC Work
Biweekly progress meetings
Design development and construction sequencing
Pipeline location and conditions assessment
Confined space entry permits for tank entries
Collaborative design items
• Tank hatch, specialized coatings and quantities, ladder replacement, overflow box/pipe, concrete anchorages
Constructability and design feedback of 60% and 90% submittals
Cost Estimates and guaranteed maximum price
Divide the Contract documents into two construction packages for Tank #1 and #2.
Nathan:
So the, scope of the CMGC work, this would include biweekly meetings, the design, development and construction sequencing, all of this done. And, conjunction with the contractor, existing pipelines, locations and condition assessments, making sure that all of the entries are taken care of in a safe manner. And then there's a lot of, like, collaborative design and then really working toward the 60 and 90% submittals, at which point we'd be doing, looking at generating cost estimate, cost estimates and then a guaranteed maximum price or GMP, and then dividing those, contract documents into two separate packages for tank one and tank to zoom out a little bit here.
Describer:
On screen. Slide Deck from Kennedy Jenks
Selection Process
Proposals score on:
• Contractor’s CMGC project approach
• Experience with collaborative project delivery
• Competence and availability of recommended project manager and superintendent
• Proposed preconstruction and construction phase services fee
Contractor - Myers & Sons
Pre-Construction fee $72,455.00
Construction Phase Markup 10%
Contractor - STRUCTURAL
Pre-Construction fee $213,520.00
Construction Phase Markup 10%
Cost savings on:
• Pipe locating and conditions assessment
• Design support • Design review
Nathan:
So for the selection process, we reached out to, well, we didn't reach out, so we we published the RFP. I think we had, 7 or 8 people meet on site for pre-construction meetings or for pre proposal meetings to kind of get a feel for it. Of all of those, we had two respondents, Myers and Sons and structural structural Myers and Sons.
If that sounds familiar, it's because they're currently doing the we work on our water treatment plan. The proposals are scored on the contractor CMGC approach, collaborative delivery competence and then approved proposed pre-construction phase service fees. So myself, Rene and Jana all went went through all of those proposals. And so that's kind of where we got to this point in the recommendation.
There is it was honestly fairly clear with the two respondents that we got, structural had some pretty significant cost deltas. There were some different, structures they put in terms of like ours applied, pipe condition assessment methodologies that could have increased their they could have reduced their price compared to Myers and Sons. But really, no matter how how we sliced it, Myers and Sons came in.
Just much lower, even with some of those trying to account for some of those different variables. So Myers and Sons is, the recommendation we have. Kennedy Jenks has included a letter of recommendation in the board packet that goes into a little bit more detail. But I'll take a break here and pause to see if there are any questions.
Rene. Adam, if you have anything that you wanted to add. Jana anything you wanted to add, feel free.
Jana:
May I just speak real fast to the board? Sure. So after reviewing the proposals, just like Nathan said, even if you were to take the cost component out of it, I still would have made the same selection that Nathan is referring to when going with the Myers.
It just had their, relevant project experience. So and then we just can't help but look at the you huge difference in the price. And I think that comes from then knowing what to expect versus the other proposal. Not that they had more of a level of unknowns. So I, I definitely support the Myers.
Tera:
Thank you.
That's really helpful because that's exactly what I was going to ask about. That's a big disparity. And and bid and saying that you took the cost out of it and actually just looked at, how their technical solution that that gives me more confidence than just taking the lowest bid when there's that big of a difference.
Jana:
Yeah. I mean, I really think the other proposal, they just I didn't know there's a lot of unknowns.
And so I think that kind of just throw a conservative number at it. And and so that's the only thing I can figure out because if you're getting the same deliverable. How are they so different on price?
James:
Okay, I had a question, Nathan. Yeah. The interconnect pipe that you talk about, that eight inch pipe, I think it was eight inch. How was how is that going to be handled? Is it just going to be capped? Is it going to be valved? And, you know, the isolate it from our system? I just wasn't clear on that.
Nathan:
Yeah. It'll excuse me. It'll just be capped and abandoned in place.
James:
Okay. Thanks. Appreciate it.
Jason:
Thank you very much, Jana, for taking part in this and being available to the team. I think, I think I would go with staff's recommendation on this. Leah did you have anything?
Leah:
No, I did not. Thank you, though.
Jason:
Very good. I'll move to, go ahead.
Describer:
On screen. Proposed Motion
I move to approve the CMGC Agreement with Myers & Sons for the South Tank Rehabilitation Project and to delegate authority to the District Manager to finalize the agreement, negotiate any non-material contract modifications, and execute the agreement, subject to review and approval by legal counsel.
Nathan:
So sorry to interrupt. So real quickly, I just wanted to kind of explain the proposed motion and some of the, language in it. So the next step from here, assuming that the board proposes a motion, approves the presented motion would be to finalize contract modifications.
And then we'd also, run that through, Paul's office. Paul also reviewed all of the contract documents prior to this. So, there shouldn't be any real surprises there. One of the things that we did want to talk to Meyers and Sons about, was their methodology for the, pipe condition assessment. So we want to really kind of get a good feel for what they wanted to do and then potentially look at some other alternatives that might give us a better feel for what that pipe looked like.
Those would also increase the cost, as well. So there's a chance at that, 70, I think the other $76,000, the actual contracted price would be above that. But we really just wanted to work through that negotiations. Negotiations with them. Adam, was there anything else? There was the pipe condition assessment. I thought maybe 1 or 1 other thing we were going to discuss with them.
Adam Marquez, Kennedy Jenks:
Yes. Just confirming their understanding on, the confined space permitting was was the other. The second thing is just to confirming that they included, carrying the confined space permit and and that $72,000. We think they did. But we want to confirm.
Nathan:
Yeah. So with that.
Tera:
And in the event that that really comes back a lot higher, what happens then?
Nathan:
If I it would be shocking if it came back significantly higher. I don't think we're going to be in either case remotely approaching the, the other proposal. You could also, with, you know, per approval as well, so we could continue that, touch point with Jana and also include her as an approval point.
And so the board does have a representative as part of the motion, we could delegate authority to both myself and Jana, to finalize the agreement, if that would give the board more comfort.
Tera:
I like that approach.
James:
I do as well.
Jason:
With that approach. How do we change the motion?
Tera:
I move to approve CMGC agreement with Myers and Sons for the South tank, rehabilitate the rehabilitation project, and to delegate authority to the District Manager and Director Krell to finalize the agreement, negotiated any non-material contract modifications and execute the agreement subject to review and approval by legal counsel.
Leah:
I second.
Board Voting All Speak:
All right, having a second. We will go to vote. Leah.
Approve. Jim. Approve. Tera. Approve. Jana. I. I approve as well.
Jason:
I gotta tell you, this zoom thing keeps moving everybody's names around. And it's not like when we're in the Dias and I can look at each person and call on them. So.
Tera:
I know I keep turning my video off.
Jason:
All right. Okay, so, we have approval for the, CMGC award. We can go ahead and close out item number 6 and move on to item number seven, the financial report with Eric and Molly. Eric.
Describer:
On screen.
TO: Board of Directors – Castle Pines North Metropolitan District FROM: Eric Harris, Elevated Clarity (EC)
DATE: June 22, 2026
RE: Financial Report – June 2026 Board of Directors Meeting
General Fund Activity
Actual revenues as of April 30, 2026, were $1,051,476. Additionally, the District recognized $567,592 in property tax revenues received from Douglas County and $22,449 in specific ownership tax revenues. This represents 58.48% of the budgeted property taxes from the District’s mill levy year-to-date. The District receives the majority of annual property taxes February through June of each year. Indirect cost revenue amounts received to date in the General Fund from the Water and Wastewater Funds totals $378,056, $252,851 from the Water Fund and $125,205 from the Wastewater Fund.
Total actual expenditures as of April 30, 2026, were $771,364, The current net result is a positive change in funds available of $280,112.
Enterprise Fund Activity
Billed water usage for April 2026 was 38,906,000 gallons and 105,690,000 gallons year to date, representing a 19.62% increase over the prior year-to-date period.
Water services revenues (volumetric charges) for April 2026 were $236,743. Wastewater services revenues (volumetric charges) for the same period were $169,601. Wastewater service charges are assessed and set based upon the winter usage for individual account holders.
Molly Janzen, Accountant:
Yes. Good evening board. Hi, Molly. Unfortunately, my video is not working right now, but I'm going to go ahead and just give a brief overview of the finance information in your packet.
Not intending to spend a lot of time this month, because the next couple of months, we will be diving into more detail. We will be looking at our audited results for the 2025 year, looking at where we are in 2026 as we get ready to, build our budget for 2027. So the next couple of months will spend a lot more, time analyzing this.
So this is just a real high level report this evening. But please, please let me know if you have questions. As always, the first page in our finance packet is the memo. The monthly memo just containing, some snapshot information for you. I won't go into a lot of detail. Just a couple things I wanted to point out here on page 349 of your packet, the cash and investment, balances that are presented at the top of that page are exactly like we expected.
Our cash balances are going down, but that's a good thing. That's because we are executing, the activities that we put into the 2026 budget. So that is why that cash balance is going down. And then the other thing in the memo is just to look at, the current state of some of the projects we have going on related to finance on page 350.
Describer:
On screen. Current Projects
Currently, EC is working with District staff and contractors on implementing the following process changes and
projects:
- Assist with the implementation of CUSI (billing system) UB4. CUSI has converted rates and account information to the new platform.
- The District engaged Blackbaud Advisory consultants to strengthen the District’s general ledger and financial system configuration. Next-quarter priorities are to (i) build report groupings to streamline financial reporting and (ii) update the Vendor Master File in preparation for transitioning to the online AP function (Payment Assist) and expense management modules which will streamline and enhance monthly financial reporting.
- The District’s auditors are in the final phases of completing the audit draft for review. We anticipate sending the draft out by June 30, 2026, as required by Colorado Revised Statutes.
- We have started a second-round review of the proposed District Records Management Structure with District Staff. We also met with Greystone in early June to discuss a scope of work for potentially moving the District from a local server to an online SharePoint solution. More details will be forthcoming as they become available.
- Establish accounts with InBank and CSAFE as authorized by the Board. The Board will be kept informed of our progress as we implement these new solutions into the District’s treasury management systems.
- Evaluate reserve levels and types of reserves to develop, recommend, and ultimately adopt a reserves policy.
- Update and streamline reporting for capital projects. Anticipated
Upcoming Schedule (subject to change)
June 22, 2026 – Monthly Board Meeting
June 30, 2026 – Deadline for Draft Audit to Board
July 20, 2026 – Monthly Board Work Session
July 27, 2026 – Monthly Board Meeting
July 31, 2026 – Deadline for Submitting 2025 Audit to State Auditor’s Office
Molly:
The most important one right now is for us to finish up the audit.
We have been in communication with them. The audit has gone very well. Even considering we had some new, larger issues to deal with, all of those conveyances from the district over to the city, that type of thing. But it's going well. We do still anticipate getting a draft this week from the auditors that will then be reviewed by us initially, and then we will get that out to the board by June 30th, which is required by statute.
So that's the most pressing thing right now. We we also, with the board's approval of executing, new bank accounts with InBank and CSAFE. we are working on getting the paperwork, gathered for those two, new, banks that we will be using. Any questions on the memo before I move on?
Jason:
I don't hear any Molly.
Describer:
On screen.
STATEMENT OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
BUDGETARY (NON-GAAP) BASIS
December 31, 2025 Actual, 2026 Adopted Budget 2026 Actuals, Budget and Variance Through April 30, 2026
Molly:
Okay. So then we'll just take a quick look at the financials. So starting on page.
352, you will see the summary financials for each of the funds. I'm just going to keep this super high level. What I noticed with General Fund is that we are right on track with the change in fund balance. Our adopted budget. We had a $250,045.00 change in fund balance anticipated. And what we're seeing based on actual compared to budget through this point of time $280,112.00.
So just about $20,000 different from where we thought we would be at the end of April. These financials are the end of April and where we are. So the reason for this, this is what we expect with this fund. The expenditures are more predictable than in the water and wastewater funds. So, we expect the trend to continue that this one will stay very well aligned with the budget.
Then if we move on down to the water fund, the things that we're seeing in this fund is that right now, our operating expenditures are trending below budget. And if you remember, last year, our expenditures trended above budget because we had a lot of repairs and maintenance in this fund. So that we will keep an eye on that.
It's still very early in the year to look at our overall, the overall impact to the ending funds available. But in general, that's where we're at with that fund right now. And then if you move on to the wastewater fund on page 353, the message is a little different than the water fund. This fund, we're actually trending.
Our expenditures are trending, a little bit over budget. And that is because of some of those repairs and maintenance costs that we've talked about in previous meetings that have occurred this year. Again, we will keep an eye on that. And make a recommendation to amend the budget if we end up needing to do that. But right now, that is the situation with the wastewater fund.
Overall, no large surprises when we put these financials together. Through April 30th. Any questions on the financials before we move on?
Jason:
I don't hear any Molly.
Molly:
Okay. So then just the remaining finance items in your packet are those supplemental schedules that we provide related to property taxes and the aged receivables report. That's just to give you a snapshot of where we are. We do expect our property taxes. The majority of the rest of the taxes to be collected, to be collected in June.
So when we, look at our June financials, we'll see that that's closer to 100%, of what we budgeted. And then the final pages in the packet are just those additional, payment, information that was presented. And then you just approved in consent agenda, and that concludes what's in our packet tonight. And Eric is here, also and you can see him.
Jason:
Good evening, Eric.
Molly:
And, we are welcome to answer any questions you might have.
Jason:
Thank you. Guys, does any of the board have any questions regarding the financial report?
Tera:
Good summary. I don't.
Jason:
Very good. Guys. I think not hearing any questions, and I don't have any questions myself. Thank you again for making this report so much easier to read and comprehend. We will go ahead and close out the finance report, item number seven.
And move on.
So I don't know where I cut off my mic. But I was saying that we're close on item number seven, the finance report, and we'll open up item number eight, the legal counsel report. Good evening Paul.
Describer:
On screen. MEMORANDUM
TO: Castle Pines North Metropolitan District
FROM: Seter, Vander Wall & Mielke, P.C.; Paul Polito, Esq.
DATE: June 22, 2026
RE: Legal Status Report for the June 22, 2026 Board Meeting
Paul:
Hi again everyone. The legal status report is on page 365 of your packet. Most of these will be items that we all discussed and at the last work session and were within the consent agenda today, as well as the Hidden Point hearing, which was also conducted today.
So, I won't necessarily get into the details on this and unless anybody has any questions, comments, concerns, anything regarding the legal report.
Jason:
Thank you. Paul. It seems like we have discussed most of these issues at length. Does anybody have any questions regarding anything for Paul? All right. Now hearing any Paul.
Paul:
All right. Fair enough. Well, that was all the items.
Most again, we're in the consent agenda, so nothing else for legal tonight.
Jason:
All right. Very good. We will go ahead and close out. Item number eight, the legal counsel report, and we will move on to item number nine, the district manager report. Good evening Nathan.
Describer:
On screen. Memorandum
From: Nathan J. Travis
To: CPNMD Board of Directors
Date: 06/22/26
Re: District Manager’s Report
AGENDA ITEMS
Stantec Study, Regional water supply study (Agenda Item A)
• An in-person workshop to discuss various opportunities is set for July 1st. The board can expect a substantial update at the July or August Board Meeting. This has been delayed from previous reports due to scheduling challenges between all of the participants.
• The project remains on budget.
• The milestones for the remaining project schedule include:
o Mid- April — Spheros Environmental – Finalize water yield analysis (complete) o End of April – Virtual meeting to review water yields findings (Scheduled)
o Wednesday July 1st — Final in-person workshop
o Mid July 2026 — Draft Final review
o July/August 2026 — Final Deliverable
Interconnect Pump Station- Surge System Modifications (Agenda Item B)
• This project will be sent out for a formal bid, following State of Colorado bidding requirements. This is contrary to the discussion we had at the study session last week. However, following that meeting, in subsequent conversations with Legal, it was determined that a formal bid process would be necessary. We will work to get this accomplished as expediently as possible.
Filter Rehab Project Update (Agenda Item C)
• We officially have all 6 filters at our treatment plant up and running! Work still remains on several items, including safety railing, flooring, HVAC, and control programming. The filters are preforming well, with extremely low post-filter turbidity (water clarity). We look forward to hosting an open house at the facility this coming fall!
Well Status Updates (Agenda Item D)
• Re-installation of wells A-1, A-2 and A6 is complete. We have been working through start-up on the wells. The work on A-1 and A-2 was completed under warranty. Two of the wells require additional evaluation before being put into service. Operations, along with Layne Enterprises, Principle Electric, and Mountain Peaks Control will be meeting on site Wednesday June 23rd.
• A-1: Startup went well however operations noticed that A-1 Was running intermittently, so it has been taken offline waiting for further evaluation.
• A-6: The Breaker tripped shortly after the initial start-up of this well. We are taking a conservative approach with these wells, so it is also waiting for further evaluation.
• A-2: Startup has gone smoothly, and the well continues to function as normal.
Nathan:
Good evening guys. I'll jump into my agenda items here and then, ask if you have any other further questions.
One thing I wanted to give the board an update on is the Stantec study. So I had previously, indicated that we would have more of an update for you this meeting. We had been scheduled to meet the week of, I think, June 8th. All the participants to kind of go over our scoring. There were a couple of the participants that weren't able to make that week.
The next day that we were all available. Is this coming up June, Wednesday, June 1st or July 1st? So we're all going to get together Wednesday, July 1st. I should have the final results rolled back relatively quickly after that. I'm still hopeful for, deliverable to be presented at the July board meeting. I'll certainly keep you guys updated and let you know if anything else, pushes that back or what the final timeline is.
Rene and I will be working on our part, this week and getting that over to Stantec so that they've got it and plenty of time to get it integrated. For agenda item B, I already sent out an email, earlier this week for the board, but for the public and just the record, following through from the end, study session, the interconnect pump station, surge monitoring system modifications because of the dollar amount involved or projected.
Now, we are required by state law to move forward with the formal bid process. I've already started conversations with Highlands Ranch and Operations to see if there's anything that we can do to still get that done this year. You know, even if that means not having access to the interconnect pump station, as quickly as we normally would.
But we'll move. We'll move forward from there. I will, I will stop and, take any questions on this one or Paul if there's any, flavor you would like to add regarding the legal requirements there.
Paul:
Only that, you know, if the capital project is above $120,000 and it is required by statute to be put out for a bid. Where all interested parties have an opportunity to place a bid.
Originally the thought was that this may be below that, but obviously after we received the the numbers back, they're all fairly well above that $120,000, standard. So. Okay, unfortunately, we will have to go through the bidding process on this one.
Nathan:
Any other questions? Okay.
Jason:
I don't think that's such a bad thing.
James:
I just had one quick one, for Nathan, is the surge protection system, and I again, we have a bit of, you know, topology in our system, but is this, you know, if we put in the surge protection, is it going to be something that's fairly standard, design wise, or is each one unique to the individual systems and things like that?
And, then maybe not talking sizing, but, you know, as far as how people will implement these?
Nathan:
Get the, the current or the new design that we're implementing is a much more standard system, just high pressure blow off in a valve rather than like larger bladder system. Rene, did you have a comment there?
Deputy District Manager Rene Santin:
Yeah, I just wanted to say that.
What's driving this? It's, is the large capacity pumps and the long, straight pipeline. Whenever you have those two conditions, you can get pressure waves. If they were to be, sudden shut off like a power loss. So the, the, the previously hydro pneumatic tank that was installed is one way to do it, but this blow off is, another, more common way.
But the driver is the long pipeline and the pump station, so we shouldn't need it. Like, there's nothing else in the distribution system that would require something like that. If that makes sense. I don't know if that's what you were asking.
James:
But, I guess I should have been clearer. The only thing I was really asking was, can we leverage what other, metros have done in to essentially protect, you know, their pump stations or systems?
And, you know, because we do have a lot of up and down in the south metro areas, Forest Hills and things like that. And I, I was just looking to make sure that we're doing this practice and that our system would be similar to design wise to other systems. So we can kind of maybe leverage people. If we go out for bid, they'll understand what we're asking for.
That's all.
Rene:
Yeah. And we are. And this is, this is a common, way of protecting the system. And and the, the only place then needs this type of protection is that, at a pump station, because of because of the long pipeline. So you we have a booster pump station, but it goes straight to distribution.
And the more the pipe branches out, the pressure wave, has other places to go with a long pipeline. It only has, you know, the pipeline. Sure. So, yeah, we are.
James:
You know, just making sure we weren't doing something unusual or unique. And, Thank you. Appreciate it.
Jason:
Thanks, Jim. Any other questions?
Hearing none. I think we can move on to the, water treatment plant shelter upgrade project.
Nathan:
Yep. So this is my personal favorite thing on the agenda tonight. The filter that their treatment plant have all been replaced, and they are up and running. So we have been on all six of our filters for a bout of. Whoa, I don't know, about seven days now.
They are performing fantastically. We did, at one point. I don't know if anybody saw put a notice up on the website when we first started bringing those filters online, the raw water system being down for as long as it was gave us a massive slug of iron. So we had some really, really dark water coming into the plant over the top of our new filters.
Had that happened with our previous filters, I can say with absolute confidence that we would be we would have been feeling discolored water calls. The new filters didn't even blink. They they handled it without a problem. So, they're they're up and performing really, really well. We do have, some other work to continue with the plant, really to HVAC,flooring and kind of, lipstick and makeup stuff.
Once we get all of that done, we'll get our, well, prior to getting that done. But after all of that is complete, we'll get a, an open house scheduled at the plant. Sigler Communications and I have been working a little bit on, kind of prepping for that, so we'll get that broad, get that on the schedule, targeting August.
September. It just really depends on how things wrap up with, with the punch list of the plant.
Jason:
Hey, Nathan, I have a question. Kind of related. When we drain the tanks, for the filter, for the tank rehab, are we going to. Is that going to stir up anything in our system? And will that. And, gee, are you confident that, these, new filter beds will take care of that?
Nathan:
So the tanks are all treated water that's already been pushed in the distribution system. So now and taking those off line doesn't really create, like, pressure or flow events. We'll still have one tank on line at the same elevation. It'll be at our lower demand, lower demand times. So I really don't anticipate anything, in terms of like discolored water, system, upset events.
Jason:
Okay. Thanks.
Nathan:
All right, the, final thing I have on the agenda that I wanted to get on the board's radar, with the treatment plant coming back online. As you I'm sure I'll remember, we definitely had our fair share of issues with Wells last year. So A1, A2, and A6 had all been put back in the ground, but we hadn't had an opportunity to do start up on any of them.
We have had a couple hiccups. I don't have a lot of information on them right now. A1 was running fine for a little while, and then it was turning itself off. So we let it do that a couple times and we just took it out of service. We're really just trying to take an incredibly cautious approach with these.
So more so than we would, have otherwise, if we didn't kind of have use history with these ones. So we've got and then A two, I'm sorry, A six, when we turned it on the breaker trip pretty quickly. So we want to make sure that we get an electrical evaluation done on the battery drive cabinet before we turn it on again and potentially create any other issues.
A2 fired right up. It's running clear. It's running better than it has probably in my entire tenure here. So A1 and A6, we have operations. Our electrician, our skater guys, our, our pump guy are, well, guys are all going to meet out there, this coming Wednesday morning. Once I get more information from that meeting, I will, send out an update to the board, kind of letting them know what we found out, what our status is with those.
I don't really have a lot of other information about them at this time, though.
And that is all I had on the agenda for this evening. If there are any other questions about my report, I'm happy to answer those. Oh, and then, real quick, it just occurred to me we are hopefully back in person starting with the July work session. I will know for sure by July 1st, so I'll send that out.
But we should be we should be face to face. And finally, free of not being able to see each other in the same room.
Jason:
Okay, great. Thanks. Nathan. anybody else have any questions for Nathan?
All right. Hearing. Then we will go ahead and close. Item number nine, the district manager's report, and we'll open up item number ten, the operations and engineering reports.
Nathan:
Happy to answer anybody. Any questions anybody has on these. otherwise, I don't have anything specific call out.
Jason:
Okay. Does any of the board members have any questions regarding the operations and engineering report?
All right. Hearing none, we will go ahead and close out item number ten, the Operations and Engineering report. And we will move to item number 11. District matters. District matters. Directors matters. Do any of the directors have any issues they'd like to bring up at this time?
Tera:
I don't have an issue, but I wanted to thank staff for their participation and representing us in the South Metro Water Festival. It was a really hot day, but mean. I don't know that. And Rene could give you a little bit on that. I don't know that it was super well attended, but there are really it was geared, it was geared more towards kids and educating, our next generation to the future about conserving water with really, fun projects.
So, let's get it in Castles Pines next year.
Jason:
Thanks. And that, brings up another point, Nathan, could other stuff coming up in the next month that we should be aware of?
Nathan:
We do have the party in the Pines event. District staff will be attending that. One of the board will be welcome to, attend.
Also, obviously, I'll send out an invite. Other than that, I don't think we've got anything that we'll be attending. There are a number of, chamber events and concerts that the water cart will be present at, and then we will also head up, assist with set up for the city splash day. That's at Elk Ridge Park.
I can send out a list of just all of those events so that everybody's aware.
Jason:
Please do.
James:
I just I just remembered something. Nathan. Real quick, sir, the, experiment or demonstration of the grass, the dog stuff. And I forget the name of the other one, if you can remind me. Tahoma 31. Tahoma 31.
Okay.
I was just wondering if, that's moving forward or if you had any more conversations about it.
Nathan:
No. I've been I have engaged in some phone tag. So, I think everybody's interested in moving forward. Probably putting a project in line, for next year, but I don't have a substantive update. But I'll let you know hopefully at the next meeting, I should have more.
James:
Okay. Yeah, I was just interested in it. So thanks.
Jason:
Great. Thanks, Jim. Yeah. Anybody else have any comments?
Okay. Everybody's quite tonight. So, having that we will close out director's matters and we'll move to item number 12 which is to adjourn. Thank you everyone.